FREE CONSULTATION (314) 361-4300
Free Consultation

Should I File for Unemployment While My Work Comp Case is Pending?

You may want to file for unemployment because you need money to pay bills.

Applications for unemployment benefits can be used against you. For example, if you stop working or are fired because of your work injury, you may want to file for unemployment because you need money to pay bills. However, the unemployment claim will include your statement, โ€œI can work.โ€ Meanwhile, your workersโ€™ compensation lawyer is pursuing the WC insurance company for wage loss benefits (TTD) because you allege that you cannot work due to your injury. The employer/insurer will subpoena your entire unemployment file.

FREE CONSULTATION

unemployment-during-work-comp-case

30 YEARS EXPERIENCE

OVER $100 MILLION COLLECTED

ONLY WORK COMP

If you apply for unemployment, you should write something like, โ€œI am off work as my employer fired me due to my restrictions from my work injury. I will try to work out of necessity with my restrictions as I have bills to pay.โ€

You donโ€™t want any statements in your unemployment case to come back and haunt your workersโ€™ compensation case. Missouri workersโ€™ compensation states you cannot receive wage loss (TTD) from work comp while receiving unemployment checks.

Kenneth TILLEY v. USF HOLLAND INCORPORATED

However, in Kenneth TILLEY, Respondent v. USF HOLLAND INCORPORATED, Appellant, and Treasurer Of Missouri as Custodian of The Second Injury Fund, Respondent, the ED court of appeals explained that an unemployment application only means that an employee was willing to try to work :

โ€œEmployer also argues Claimant is not entitled to temporary total disability benefits because his application for unemployment benefits was โ€œan affirmation that he was capable of substantial gainful employment and that he would seek employment.โ€ However, the fact that the Claimant filed for unemployment is not an admission that he could work but that he was willing to try to work. The claimant testified that the Employer told him it would not give him any work unless he were โ€œ[one hundred percent].โ€ The claimant also testified that his union representative said no one would hire him because he had back surgery. Although the record indicates the Claimant was willing to work, there was nothing in the record to show he could work. Employerโ€™s assertion that an application for unemployment benefits demonstrates an ability to work fails, and its reliance on Thorsen v. Sachs Elec. Co., 52 S.W.3d 611, 622 (Mo.App. W.D.2001)(holding while the claimantโ€™s โ€œapplication for unemployment benefits is a factor to be considered, upon review of the record, we agree with the Commission and find that [the claimant] sufficiently carried his burden of proof that he was unable to work as a result of his injuries and was still working toward attaining maximum medical improvement during the periods for which the Commission awarded TTD.โ€) is misplaced.โ€

The Case of Lewis v. National Vendors

Also, the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission in Jefferson City ruled in 2013, Lewis v. National Venders, that unemployment only cancels out TTD but does not offset PTD, which are weekly payments made to the employee after reaching MMI and who is found to be unemployable from any work:

โ€œThe Second Injury Fund urges us to grant it a credit against its permanent total disability liability for periods during which the employee received unemployment compensation. The Second Injury Fund argues that allowing individuals to receive unemployment compensation and permanent total disability benefits for the same period is not good public policy. We are not unsympathetic to the Second Injury Fundโ€™s argument. However, we are bound to apply the law as the legislature enacted it. To that end, we must strictly construe the Workersโ€™ Compensation Law (Law) provisions.

โ€œStrict construction means that a statute can be given no broader application than is warranted by its plain and unambiguous terms. The operation of the statute must be confined to matters affirmatively pointed out by its terms and to cases that fall fairly within its letter. A strict construction of a statute presumes nothing that is not expressed.โ€

We find no language in the Law that allows us to deny permanent total disability benefits for periods during which employees received unemployment compensation. If we were to apply the Law as if it contained such language as urged by the Second Injury Fund, we would be extending it to matters not affirmatively pointed out by its terms in violation of the legislatureโ€™s mandate that we construe the statute strictly.

Contact James M. Hoffmann

At the Law Office of James M. Hoffmann, our attorneys will work with you, regardless of where you are in the process. Attorney James M. Hoffmann has spent most of his more than 20-year legal career protecting injured workersโ€™ rights.

The Missouri Workersโ€™ Compensation system is not your friend. We can help you take the steps necessary to protect your rights and recover payment for lost wages, medical care for your injuries, or a settlement for permanent partial disability or permanent total disability should you not be able to return to work.

Contact us today at (314) 361-4300, or you can also complete our Online Case Evaluation Form. All communications are returned promptly.

Workers Compensation Benefits Missouri

Click to Call (314) 361-4300 Online Case Evaluation Form